This one caught me by surprise; I didn't realize that there was something noteworthy here until I uploaded the photos from the camera. I first told you about Transaero last week, so what have we here?
nice catch of a non-ER 777-300! I haven't seen one at LAX since Korean flew them in a while back. I'll be spotting on Sunday hoping to catch the Transaero 777 (any model is fine).
Good eyes, all! What made this noteworthy was that we were specifically briefed that Transaero was going to be operating B772s at LAX; none of us even knew they had B773s until this one showed up. So far, I haven't seen another one.
This blog was created for my personal amusement as well as the 'edu-tainment' of family and friends. You are welcome to read and comment. However, please understand that this is not an official FAA publication, and nothing herein is to be taken for public policy or agency position. All opinions are my own, unless explicitly stated otherwise. While I make a reasonable effort to report facts correctly, there is always the possibility that I may be misinformed or just can't proofread my own work. No government time or resources are used for the maintenance of this blog. Enjoy, and thanks for reading!
it's a 773 no a 772
ReplyDeleteWell, this one's a -300...
ReplyDeleteit is a 777-300, while the pic from last week was a 777-200?
ReplyDelete-300 instead of the -200?
ReplyDeleteA former SIA 773 under Transaero colors...
ReplyDeleteIsnt this a 773 rather than a 772????
ReplyDeleteJohn
(Liverpool)
nice catch of a non-ER 777-300! I haven't seen one at LAX since Korean flew them in a while back. I'll be spotting on Sunday hoping to catch the Transaero 777 (any model is fine).
ReplyDeleteGood eyes, all! What made this noteworthy was that we were specifically briefed that Transaero was going to be operating B772s at LAX; none of us even knew they had B773s until this one showed up. So far, I haven't seen another one.
ReplyDeleteCV