This one caught me by surprise; I didn't realize that there was something noteworthy here until I uploaded the photos from the camera. I first told you about Transaero last week, so what have we here?
nice catch of a non-ER 777-300! I haven't seen one at LAX since Korean flew them in a while back. I'll be spotting on Sunday hoping to catch the Transaero 777 (any model is fine).
Good eyes, all! What made this noteworthy was that we were specifically briefed that Transaero was going to be operating B772s at LAX; none of us even knew they had B773s until this one showed up. So far, I haven't seen another one.
it's a 773 no a 772
ReplyDeleteWell, this one's a -300...
ReplyDeleteit is a 777-300, while the pic from last week was a 777-200?
ReplyDelete-300 instead of the -200?
ReplyDeleteA former SIA 773 under Transaero colors...
ReplyDeleteIsnt this a 773 rather than a 772????
ReplyDeleteJohn
(Liverpool)
nice catch of a non-ER 777-300! I haven't seen one at LAX since Korean flew them in a while back. I'll be spotting on Sunday hoping to catch the Transaero 777 (any model is fine).
ReplyDeleteGood eyes, all! What made this noteworthy was that we were specifically briefed that Transaero was going to be operating B772s at LAX; none of us even knew they had B773s until this one showed up. So far, I haven't seen another one.
ReplyDeleteCV